Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Renewable Energy Tax Extenders
Monday, July 7, 2008
Modern Day Slaves Addicted to Oil
The government says that alternative energy is too far away and why we need to keep the drilling piece front and center. Well that is simply not true. They say theses technologies are too expensive and we need to let the market decide who will be the winners and losers. That is also not true. The fact is the government has picked the winners and that is BigOil. The losers are alternative energy. The real underlying issue holding back alternatives and one that does not get reported in any meaningful way is that BigOil receives over $5.00 per gallon in hidden subsidies, incentives and tax schemes over the pump price. It is amazing that the talking heads representing the status quo are not fact checked by the media because these facts are readily available. These hidden incentives include depreciation allowances, master limited partnerships, pipelines built with taxpayer monies and then the talking heads say that alternative energy is too expensive. Come on, that is disingenuous. Where are the infrastructures built for alternatives? Where is parity within the tax code for alternative energy? Well there are none, only mere teasers to make it look good and to make you feel better about what we are doing as a nation.
Oh, one more point. Solar was making headway so they needed to be slowed down. So, Congress came up with a two year moratorium on building solar facilities on public land. Congress passes that, yet they can not even pass an extension for one year of mere teasers that alternative energies receive even when the public is crying and demanding change. Let us face reality. We are modern day slaves and the pharaohs are BigOil.
Friday, June 20, 2008
No kidding, Trouble with Carbon Cap-and-Trade Markets, Who Would Have Guessed
There is so much interference and diversion away from carbon facts. For instance, proponents of cap-and-trade point to the success of SOx pollution trading schemes as a reason why this would work for carbon. Well, not so fast as these are totally different compounds. Carbon dioxide emissions are pervasive in the environment and are not isolated to SOx emitters.
One glaring example is the use of natural gas, which produces lots of power and that does not have sulfur or SOx, but lots of fossil fuel CO2 emissions. See the point.
Other real problems with cap-and-trade is the uncertainty in the price and the legitimacy of carbon offset programs. How does one protect against huge historical price swings and validate or even audit CO2 offset claims. Who is ultimately responsible if these offset are fraudulent credits being sold by manipulators?
A cap-and-trade sounds like a compromise but it is just another head fake on the public. A Btu tax, although politically more difficult, creates market certainty and eliminates these loopholes and potential for manipulations. A tax, of course, would disappoint financial institutions, attorneys and environmental groups that were anxious to capitalize on a new global trading scheme. Oh well!
Wednesday, June 18, 2008
Floods, Disaster Clean-up and Lack of Energy
With the predictions of more intense storms, droughts and flooding, the time has come for this to be constructed in order to bring relief to areas hit by disaster.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
We are Now Forcing U.S. Beef on Korea
The fix is simple. Ban cannibalism and the processing of sick and downer animals from entering the food chain. Even if we believe there is still a debate on science related to food safety, we are losing billions of dollars in sales, and our reputation for producing quality meats is being tarnished. It may be reaching the point that the damage will be irreparable if the FDA and the USDA do nothing to alleviate food safety concerns.
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Reading About It
BARTA, the transportation authority in Reading, Pennsylvania, is one of these companies. The Reading Eagle wrote about the authority's interest in CWT today. It's way too soon to know if this will actually go anywhere, but State Rep. Thomas Caltagirone from Reading actually sponsored a bill in the State legislature that would create a tax credit to lure CWT to build a plant there. He sees our technology as a way to "break the stranglehold on foreign oil." The bill didn't pass the Senate, but what's really significant is that key enterprises like BARTA and leaders like Rep. Caltagirone are demonstrating that serious mainstream interest in alternative energy solutions like ours is growing. In fact, the BARTA board is talking about forming a coalition with other public transportation systems in Pennsylvania to collaborate on the effort to get an alternative energy plant built.
This is good news indeed and, hopefully, a harbinger of things to come.
Monday, June 2, 2008
In Denial About The Energy Crunch
Ironically, the Journal says that technology stocks are holding steady as this sector takes advantage of the "export boom" stemming from the weak dollar. That's just great. We're celebrating the demise of the U.S. dollar.
How about, instead, we try shoring up the economy by replacing a key import - oil, that is -- with an alternative that we can produce domestically? Oil, that is. Yes, we can produce our own oil utilizing an abundant, renewable, readily available resource: the hundreds of millions of tons of solid waste that accumulates in this country every year.
Just imagine the ramifications -- economically, politically and environmentally -- if the United States were to stop importing oil and supply its own, based on the use of above-ground carbon stock. U.S. industry would have a reliable source of inexpensive energy. Gas pump prices would drop to realistic levels. There would be little left to fight about in the Middle East. We would solve our waste management problems and arrest global warming at the same time.
This is the stuff great headlines are made of. Maybe our new administration, whoever that turns out to be, will see the light and take steps toward an energy policy that is forward-looking and takes advantage of technologies like TCP (thermal conversion process) to change the energy paradigm. Or maybe we'll just keep wooping it up every time U.S. currency takes another plunge.
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Helping the Working Man
Did you see that story on the front page of the Wall Street Journal's "Personal Journal" section a couple of days ago, about how companies are taking emergency measures to help their employees deal with high fuel costs?
- One company gave everyone a $50 bonus in their paychecks to offset some of the cost.
- Some companies are providing van pooling or other company-sponsored transportation.
- Some are increasing reimbursable mileage rates or providing cost-of-living raises.
- One company is subsidizing employees' cost of fuel for traveling to work.
- Another is subsidizing their cost for public transportation.
- Another negotiated a discounted membership fee for its employees at a warehouse club that sells gasoline.
- Microsoft (who else would have the resources?) leased two large office complexes that are closer to home for lots of their employees.
- And -- my personal favorite -- one company pays 100% of employees' fuel costs if they agree to wrap their cars in the company's branding (60% of the employees have taken them up on it).
Why am I telling you all this? Because high fuel prices are bad for people and bad for companies.
These companies aren't taking these measures because they've had a sudden onset of beneficence. They're doing it because they're afraid their employees will quit because it's too expensive to get there. One expert cited in the article also pointed out that financial problems are a source of stress that can make employees less productive. So companies are biting the bullet and doing what they can to help, out of their own self-interest.
Once again, I'm left scratching my head.
Once again, I have to ask, What the heck is it going to take before we recognize that the answer is right in front of us?! We can lower our fuel costs by creating our own domestic source of energy instead of importing it. By using the renewable resource represented by solid waste, we can generate our own energy, solve a nasty waste problem, and contribute to the arrest of global warming. I know it can work because it is working. In Carthage, Missouri, where a subsidiary of our company is producing and selling 20,000 gallons of renewable diesel every day to local companies who use it for boiler fuel. So what we are waiting for? For our energy policy-makers to wake up before the cost of fuel bankrupts our economy.Thursday, May 8, 2008
Divided Nation
The majority of the people I spoke with get the point that we need to help industry and not chase it away. RES is selling fuel and fertilizer locally. Two large industrial entities are able to reduce energy cost while using a green fuel and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Local farmers are happy applying an organic fertilizer at a discount to chemical fertilizers, putting the wealth back into the land so it produces abundant crops.
The dedicated staff at Carthage should be commended for making this dream come true for turning waste into oil despite the exaggerated complaints and the attacks on them to keep a nuisance lawsuit alive. It is hard to believe that the nation is so divided on so many issues and a local plant that is truly amazing appears to have divided the town. We do not believe that the nation or the town are divided, but the story sure helps sell papers. You would think that even the small group of purported activist looking at the big issues facing our communities and nation would ask how to help instead of how to kill what the whole world needs; a waste to energy facility in every community.
Tuesday, May 6, 2008
The Ethanol Debate Heats Up
I have no doubt whatsoever that corn-as-fuel is bad energy policy but an important agricultural crop. There is no doubt that demand for ethanol has driven up the price of corn, a basic food staple, to the point of in-affordability for people around the world who depend on it for their daily caloric intake. One article quotes Patrick S. Schnable, a professor from Iowa State University -- smack in the corn-growing center of the world -- as saying, "Crops will go to the highest bidder, and we in the Western world are willing to pay more for fuel than poor people are able to pay for food."
"Of course, it's impossible to divert nearly one-quarter of the corn crop to fuel without causing prices to rise. Corn is now around $5.50 per bushel, more than double its price in 2005," BW says in a different article on page 60. (In fairness, the article also says the price increase in corn has had a "relatively small impact" on global food prices in general. Which may be true, but corn is the basis for the sudden world market in ethanol, which by the way, has done nothing to stop oil prices from reaching new record highs almost daily).
While scientists and industrialists continue to debate the relative merits of corn-based ethanol and to pursue other potential agricultural feedstocks for alternative energy, Changing World Technologies is successfully producing and selling commercial-grade oil from waste material. That's right. Waste. The stuff that companies pay to get rid of. The stuff that floats around on barges with nowhere to unload. The stuff that accumulates in places like the Fresh Kills landfill in Staten Island, the largest garbage dump it the world, which some residents fear may be a source of local spikes in the incidence of cancer.
The waste we use at our plant in Carthage, Missouri, is mostly turkey offal (the parts unfit for human consumption) from a local food processing plant, but any carbon-based feedstock will work. Oh, and by the way, not only are we turning a low-value waste stream into a high-value energy source, we are also demonstrating the only proven-effective way to rid the food chain of BSE, the protein that causes Mad Cow Disease.
More on this later. For now, I'll keep my eye on the ethanol match. It's hard to tell whose court the ball is in, but one thing's for sure. There's no love in this game.
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Modern Marvel
Modern Marvels showcases America's passion for ingenuity and innovation. The producers felt that our waste-into-oil technology fit their profile. Now if only our energy policy-makers would arrive at the same conclusion...!
As soon as we know the air date and time for "our" Modern Marvels segment, we'll post the information here. So keep reading!
Tuesday, April 22, 2008
The Earth Day Blues
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Food Fight
Clearly, the blame game will further distort the facts. As an example, it is not just corn (ethanol) going into cars with no meaningful C.A.F.E. standard. It is not just the fact that corn is grown with fossil fuels, and the main fertilizer used is anhydrous ammonia, which is made from natural gas. Fossil fuel prices are very high due to increasing worldwide demand. There are droughts, floods and many other factors that can and have contributed to increasing food prices. Pointing fingers is not the point. What we are missing is that growing food for fuel is a bad idea. We have a better solution -- the utilization of waste as a source for our energy needs.
Our company fights every day to gain parity under the incentives provided for both fossil fuels and traditional bio-fuels made from food crops. You would think that with all the attention being paid to the "green revolution" that our leaders in Congress and industry would actually provide additional incentives and resources to companies that can convert waste into oil. The system needs to change if we want to continue as a species. We must become sustainable, and it will not be done by accepting what big oil and big "ag" have to say. Waste to oil is one solution for avoiding the atrocities that are happening today due to diverting food into fuel, and Big Oil extracting more than a pound of flesh from every human being on this planet.
The CO2 Dilema
The U.S. thinks it is at a crossroads on how to reduce CO2 released into the atmosphere. There is only one road to take. Two be clear, there are currently two very different approaches used by governments:
- One, a tax on CO2 emitted into the air. This is the best way to go because it provides a clear price signal to the market, is less susceptible to market manipulations, and can be used as a revenue raiser to incentivize new emerging technologies that supplement fossil fuels.
- Two is a system called "Cap and Trade." But, this system DOES NOT WORK!
In the real world, these trading schemes are difficult to audit and even harder to certify as legitimate. The permits are the equivalent of cash, creating fraudulent opportunities. Some promoters argue that we could emulate what has been labeled as a successful SOx trading scheme, but that is not true. CO2 is a pervasive bi-product of the economy and long-lived in the environment. The exposed European Union failures underscore the ability for market manipulation and shows what not to do.
No one wants to create a tax since this is a repeat of the infamous "Btu tax" of the early 90's, when the nation watched one major party lose control of Congress as the result of energy tax. If we do not create a CO2 tax it would be best to just do nothing, as opposed to crafting legislation that will just lead to manipulation and another future government bailout of these buyers of fradulent permits. These would not be unintended consequences because everyone is aware of the pittfalls. It is another chance to game the system like we did with the savings and loan crises in the early 90's which blossomed into the currenet sub-prime loan crises, still unraveling today. Leave the CO2 issue alone if you cannot put a tax on carbon.
Friday, April 11, 2008
U.S. beef exported to South Korea is off close to 250,000 metric tons since the U.S. mad cow issue was disclosed at the end of 2003. There is no excuse for allowing these sales to slip away given the well documented history of BSE in Europe and the rest of the world. There has been a simple solution to solving this problem which the Canadian government adopted last year. Specifically, it would be for the U.S. to adhere to currently approved worldwide guidelines in the removal of waste and high risk materials from entering animal feed.
Why don't we have this on the books now?
It is simple, the U.S. agencies responsible (FDA and USDA) are both in a difficult position to make such simple decisions, as they promote sales but also regulate food safety. This leaves them in conflict, which means their action of doing nothing continues hurting what was one our most admired industries, meat processing. The influence over the FDA and USDA by a few powerful special interest groups will result in putting the industry at further risk to future liabilities. Two recent events, last year's pet food recall and the recent Hallmark beef recall, illustrates this vulnerability.
What is the impact of this conflict of interest?
Billions of dollars in lost sales. What is equally concerning is that once the sales void is filled from other countries that do not allow cannibalism, it will then be very difficult to get back those lost sales, costing ranchers and meat processors important jobs in the U.S.
Thursday, April 10, 2008
What's It Going to Take?
Oil prices hit another high today- over $112/barrel. What's it going take before our energy policy recognizes the sheer common sense of utilizing above-ground carbon sources to produce a domestic supply of energy? Low value waste streams from agricultural refuse [not food crops] to used tires are a ready feedstock that can be converted into renewable diesel fuel oil easily, quickly and efficiently. Our fuel is helping to keep local business in business while reducing fossil fuel use.
Let's see where imported oil prices stand tomorrow once we depoly more waste to oil facilities!
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
How TCP Works
What is really neat is the process is more than 80% energy efficient.
A limited number of government officials have provided some support but our energy and farm policies take front and center stage and the reality is new technologies are just not that important in the early stages of development. Very few congressional leaders find dealing with waste that important unless they are in highly populated states.
After the November elections, we belive efforts to turn waste to oil will become important.
Friday, April 4, 2008
Welcome
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba9df/ba9df02ac2b5d8dd722772d1cf6c862fb131d82b" alt=""